بررسی تاثیر اعتیاد به کار در بهره‌وری نیروی انسانی با تعدیل‌گری سرمایه فکری کارکنان دانشگاه لرستان

نویسندگان
طاهره محمدی
سعید فرح بخش
دانشگاه لرستان
10.52547/jde.1.2.147
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش تعیین رابطه 3 مؤلفه اعتیاد به کار (عجین شدن با کار، تمایل درونی در کار ، و لذت از کار) در بهره‌وری نیروی انسانی با تعدیل‌گری سرمایه فکری (سرمایه انسانی، سرمایه ساختاری، و سرمایه رابطه‌ای‌‌) است. روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است. نمونه آماری پژوهش شامل تعداد201نفر از کارمندان دانشگاه لرستان ، بود که با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری طبقه‌ای نسبی انتخاب شدند. ابزار اندازه گیری عبارت از سه فرم پرسشنامه پرسشنامه اعتیاد به کار اسپنس و رابینز ، پرسشنامه بهره وری نیروی انسانی براساس مدل آچیو هرسی و گلداسمیت و پرسشنامه سرمایه فکری بنیتس بود. به منظور تجزیه وتحلیل داده‌ها از روش معادلات ساختاری استفاده گردید. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که اعتیاد به کار با بهره‌وری نیروی انسانی رابطه معنی داری دارد؛ این رابطه بویژه هنگامیکه متغیر تعدیل گر سرمایه فکری وارد معادله می‌شد از استحکام بیشتری برخوردار بود. به عبارت دیگر می‌توان گفت که سرمایه فکری ، شدت رابطه بین اعتیاد به کار و بهره‌وری نیروی انسانی را افزایش می‌دهد
کلیدواژه‌ها
بهره‌وری نیروی انسانی
سرمایه فکری
اعتیاد به کار

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Effects of Workaholic in Human Resource Productivity with the Moderator of the Intellectual Capital of Lorestan University Staff

نویسندگان English

Tahere Mohammadi
Saeed Farahbakhsh
چکیده English

The purpose of this study is determine the relationship between workaholic 3 factors (Work Involvement, Feelings of Being Driven to Work, and Work Enjoyment) in Human Resource Productivity with the moderator of the intellectual capital (Human capital, structural capital and relational capital) . The research method is relative descriptive correlational. Statistical sample consisted of 201 employees Lorestan University, who were selected using stratified sampling method. Measuring instruments consists of three questionnaires workaholic Spence and Robbins questionnaire, Human Resource Productivity base on Chivy model Hersey and Goldsmith questionnaire model, Intellectual capital questionnaire Bontis . To analyze the data, structural equation was used. The results showed that workaholic has a significant relationship with Human Resource Productivity .This relationship, particularly when moderator variable of intellectual capital, entered the equation it ha greater strength .In other words, we can say that intellectual capital increase intensity of the relationship between workaholic and Human Resource Productivity

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Human Resource Productivity
Intellectual capital
Workaholic
Alvani M, Ahmadi P.(2002). Design of Total Pattern of Affecting Factors on Human Resource Productivity. Journal of Modares, Vol 5 No 1 analysis.psychometrika,49,155-173.
analysis:Effect of sample size.psychological Bulletin,103,391-411
Anderson,J.C;Gerbing,D.W(1984).The effect of sampling error on convergence,improper
Bentler,P,M,Bonett,D.G(1980).Significance Test and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of
Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3 (1) 41-60.
Cantarow, E. (1979). Women workaholics, Mother Jones, 6, 56. Castro, C. B.; Armario, E. M., & Ruiz, D. M. (2004). The influence of employee rganizational citizenship behaviorr on customer loyalty, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(1), 27.1.
Cappllor, B, ( 2001). Efficiency Factors on the Personels welfare, Public: MC Growhill.
Cherrington, DJ. (1980). “The work ethic”. American management association, New York, NY.
covariance Structures.Psychological Buletin,88,588-606
Dewi Fariha, A., & Sofian, S. (2012). The relationship between intellectual capital and corporate performance, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 537-541.
Hersey, H & Goldsmith, M 1980, 'A situational approach to performance planning', Training and Development Journal, Madison, vol. 34, no.11, p. 38.
Jones DC, Kalmi P, Kauhanen A. Human resource management policies and productivity: new evidence from an econometric case study. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2006;22(4):526-38.
Killinger, B. (1991). Workaholics: the respectable addicts, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
Lin, R, (2006). Welfare, Journal; Psychological Social, 31-33.
Machlowitz, M. (1980). Workaholics. living with them, working with them, addison-wesley publishing company, reading, MA.
Marr, B. (2004). Measuring and benchmarking intellectual capital benchmarking.
An International Journal, 11 (6) 559-570.
Marsh,H.W;Balla,J.R;Macdonald,R.P.(1998).Goodness of Fit indices in confirmatory factor
Maryama,G.M.(1997).Basics of structural equation modeling.sage publications
Naughton, T. J. (1987). A conceptual view of workaholism and implications for career counselingand research, Career Development Quarterly, 6,180-7.
Nazari R. survey on Affecting Factors on Staff productivity of Aliabad Katoul Azad University, 2008. 15_1_174
Neal A, West MA, Patterson MG. Do organizational climate and competitive strategy moderate the relationship between human resource management and productivity? Journal of Management. 2005;31(4):492-512.
Ramı´rez, Y., Lorduy, C., & Rojas, J. A. (2007). Intellectual capital management in Spanish universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8 (4) 732-748.
Schaufeli, W., Taris, T., and Van Rhenen, W. (2008). "Workaholism, Burnout, and Work Engagement: Three of a Kind or Three Different Kinds of Employee Well-being?” Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, P: 173-203
Scott, K. S.; Moore, K. S. and Miceli, M. P. (1997). "An exploration of the meaning and consequencesof workaholism", Human Relations, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp: 287-314.
Seybold, K. C., & Salomone, P. R. (1994). Understanding workaholism: a review of causescounseling approaches, Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 4-10.
Snir, R. and Zohar, D. (2008). "Workaholism as Discretionary Time Investment at Work: AnExperience-Sampling Study", Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 57, Issue. 1, P: 109-127.
solutions,and goodness of fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor
Spence, J.T. and Robbins, A.S. (1992). “Workaholism: definition, measurement and preliminaryresults”. Journal of personality assessment, Vol. 58. No. 1, PP: 160-78.
Tangen, S 2005, 'Demystifying productivity and performance', International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. vol. 53, no. 8, p. 726.
Taris, T. W.; Geurts, S. A. E.; Schaufeli, W. B.; Blonk, W. B., & Lagerveld, S.
E. (2008). All day and all of the night: the relative contribution of to dimensions of workaholism to well-being in self-employed workers. Work and Stress, 22(2), 153-165.
Vasile, Bogdan (2008) Factors Of The Earning Functions And Their Infiuence On The Intellectual Capital Of An Orga nization, Journal of applied Quantitative methods, Vol.3 ,No.4,2008.
Vaziri S, mansouri H,Adiban A.Identification & prioritize the Factors Affecting the productivity of Human Resources With MADM Technique. Jounal of Civility & Training. No 100. 2010
Wright PC, Berrell M, Gloet M. Cultural values, workplace behavior and productivity in China: A conceptual framework for practising managers. Management Decision. 2008;46(5):797-812.